2 questions. You wrote, <<This was an assassination attempt by Crooks (with or without accomplices) acting on behalf of an organization independent of Trump or the USG/Deep State with a larger political agenda. If this is the case, that organization should be expected to make itself and its agenda known. There would be no point to such an action otherwise.>>
Can you explain how you came to the assumptions and the conclusion? I'm asking in earnest. Not to look smart or clever. Pinkie swear.
- The way I see it, If someone points a gun at someone and fires, their agenda is to kill or seriously injure that person. Granted I don't have a degree in firearms (lol), but why else would someone point a gun and fire? But, it,'s SUPER illegal to point a gun and fire at someone, unless your own safety is at stake.
Ergo, It would be enormously stupid for the perpetrator to make his agenda known, because it's illegal to attempt murder.
- Question 2: Why assume that the puppet master who manipulated the shooter is independent of the deep state?
I'm super tired so hoping this makes sense. I really like your work and am asking in good faith.
FIrst of all, I thnk you understand that that Options 2 was one *possibility.* I am not saying that's what's happened. *If* there were some orgainzed political group, outside of "hidden" Deep State actors who wanted to shoot Trump to make a political point, they would have to make that point public. I'm thinking of things like a "terrorist" group. I supppose it's possible that a group could want to kill him for revenge without caring to make a public statement. I guess that what's suggested with the "iran did it" line that's now going around. But you'e not going to succeed in warnning anyone against doing something again if you don't somehow let people know you punised them for it.
As I said, I think whoever was firing at him wanted to kill him, and that rules out a Trump-driven false-flag. If all the shots had missed by yards, that would be more plausible..
Ths possibility of deep state involvement is option 4., I do rule that out. As I said, it and option 1 are what I now consider the most likely. If it were a JFK/RFK type deep-state op, there was another shooter, and Crooks was a misdirection.. There are a lot of unanswered questions, and I don't trust that we'll ever get the real answer.
I absolutely take you questions in good faith. Let me know if I've answered them satisfactorily.
P.S. great interview with Garland Nixon on this topic!
Thanks. I'm going to post it here on Substack and on my YouTube and Rumble channels.
2 questions. You wrote, <<This was an assassination attempt by Crooks (with or without accomplices) acting on behalf of an organization independent of Trump or the USG/Deep State with a larger political agenda. If this is the case, that organization should be expected to make itself and its agenda known. There would be no point to such an action otherwise.>>
Can you explain how you came to the assumptions and the conclusion? I'm asking in earnest. Not to look smart or clever. Pinkie swear.
- The way I see it, If someone points a gun at someone and fires, their agenda is to kill or seriously injure that person. Granted I don't have a degree in firearms (lol), but why else would someone point a gun and fire? But, it,'s SUPER illegal to point a gun and fire at someone, unless your own safety is at stake.
Ergo, It would be enormously stupid for the perpetrator to make his agenda known, because it's illegal to attempt murder.
- Question 2: Why assume that the puppet master who manipulated the shooter is independent of the deep state?
I'm super tired so hoping this makes sense. I really like your work and am asking in good faith.
,
Thanks for all you do!
FIrst of all, I thnk you understand that that Options 2 was one *possibility.* I am not saying that's what's happened. *If* there were some orgainzed political group, outside of "hidden" Deep State actors who wanted to shoot Trump to make a political point, they would have to make that point public. I'm thinking of things like a "terrorist" group. I supppose it's possible that a group could want to kill him for revenge without caring to make a public statement. I guess that what's suggested with the "iran did it" line that's now going around. But you'e not going to succeed in warnning anyone against doing something again if you don't somehow let people know you punised them for it.
As I said, I think whoever was firing at him wanted to kill him, and that rules out a Trump-driven false-flag. If all the shots had missed by yards, that would be more plausible..
Ths possibility of deep state involvement is option 4., I do rule that out. As I said, it and option 1 are what I now consider the most likely. If it were a JFK/RFK type deep-state op, there was another shooter, and Crooks was a misdirection.. There are a lot of unanswered questions, and I don't trust that we'll ever get the real answer.
I absolutely take you questions in good faith. Let me know if I've answered them satisfactorily.
Penultimate paragraph correction: I *do not* rule that out
Absolutely. Appreciate it!